domingo, 30 de enero de 2011

Romeo + Juliet: The Nurse Character

1. Juliet's nurse character is well represented in the movie Romeo + Juliet: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4ACrlYSxho&feature=related)
A. Nurse
a. characterization
b. character
c. stays true to the original character
B. Plot
a. flat character
b. suspense/cliff hanger
c. no coming of age
C.Place
a. time
b.location
c.cultural background
2. Summary

The way to find out if a film adaptation stays true to its original story tends to be focused on whether it has the same time of events or the same characters, nevertheless, to truly see if a movie adaptation has managed to stay true to its original version it's trough the justifying of circumstances that arrived trough the plot. An easy way to prove it is to see if a character place in the plot stays true to the original no matter the changes in time or location, in this essay I will attempt to prove why does the nanny in Romeo + Juliet film adaptation stays true to his original character (in Romeo and Juliet William Shakespeare’s original version) by analyzing the main aspects of fiction we have mention before: the characterization of the nurse, her role on the plot, and the place and cultural background of time and location she's put in.

First of all we have to describe the characterization of Juliet's nurse trough the film. When we first see her we see she's kind of chubby and has red hair with white hair all over, revealing her not so young age, she seems to have trouble walking due to her weight and love for food. Another part of her characterization can be described regarding her manner of speech, in which we can quite easily distinguish her accent when calling Juliet in a way that seems almost complete Spanish, by this we can also complement her exaggerate gestures when talking or when making facial expressions of surprise, unreal anger, tiredness, etc. On the other hand, we can see that her character seems to really care about Juliet's well-being, because she would go search for Romeo even though she knows he's a "formal enemy" of the Capulet, nevertheless, regarding the nurse under pressure we can see that she would no longer do as Juliet would wish her too, but rather stay true to her masters and to her nature of regarding Paris as a much better partner for Juliet due to the amount of money he has. As a whole, we can declared that both character and characterization stay true to the original story because even though the characterization seems to be a little way off it balances it later justifies itself due to the time and location we are being put in trough the adaptation.

As the Nurse character remains equal to the original story, the plot in which she is set would also remain intact. The fact that we can still describe the nurse as a Flat character tells us that she is as in the original story only helping the movie to build up suspense. The nurse would never have a significant change trough the story but rather would help as an archetypical character (insert in the story to full-fill the only task of helping the main heroine) to drive the story to its first cliffhanger, which would be telling Juliet that Romeo is one of the Montague. By seeing that the original dialogue of the movie is kept intact in the movie we can also proof that it hasn't lost integrity.

The place in which the movie it's set, including time and location, are another of the points to keep in mind when adapting a film, in Romeo + Juliet case we can see that the time and location have changed to a much modern and in a way decayed version of Verona, making circumstances change in order to maintain a justification of events. In the nurse case we can see that her cultural background is all the way focus on reminding us of the American families that even nowadays still leave their children's care to the also nowadays called nanny stereotyped as a foreigner just like in Juliet’s case.

In conclusion, we can see that this modern version of Romeo + Juliet keeps its fictional setting by maintaining a justified plot and characters (in this cased analyzed by the nurse) but also by justifying his new time and location. Swords and status are replaced by guns and political power, making this adaptation stay true to the original one because even though we are used to think in the story of Romeo and Juliet as this old-set story of tragic love we cannot denied that Romeo + Juliet (the film) remains also a story focused on the same theme, a tragic love story.



lunes, 24 de enero de 2011

Amadeus Freytag's Pyramid

Internal & External Conflict: Salieri's struggle to accept that he is nothing compared to Amadeus Mozart and his actions that would influence in a way Amadeus life.


1. Exposition:











Salieri talking to a priest about his story since childhood.

2. Inciting Incident:


















Amadeus mocking Salieri's music.


3. Rising Action:














Salieri decides to challenge God by destroying his creation: Amadeus


4. Climax:










Amadeus starts to believe his father has come back from death to torment him.

5. Falling Action:












Salieri helping to full-fill the requiem. (We already know what Salieri's plan is and that most likely Mozart is going to die but we see that Salieri is also accepting Mozart is the best musician ever)



6. Resolution:








This actually happens at the beggining of the movie when Salieri tries to kill himself because he can't live with the burden of thinking he has killed Amadeus

7. Dénouement:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0Z0bu-swko&feature=related

Salieri's Final Speech.

domingo, 16 de enero de 2011

Short Essay: "Pirates of the Caribbean is a fantastic movie."

1. I will try to demonstrate why Pirates of the Caribbean is a fantastic movie
A. Main character anti-hero
a. Evil pirate concept
b. Actions
c. Goals
B. Entertaining (Story)
a. Mixing antique Mayan legends
b. Details
c. Constant attention
C. Changing moral & integrity perspective
a. If pirates are seen as the villain ones, the movie would make the villain’s win
b. Integrity
c. Rules or moral code
5. Conclusion


Pirates, we have seen them in movies many many times, nevertheless, what if there was a movie that could change completely our view of them? that would make us question the real difference between right and wrong? Well then you need to know that movie already exists, and it is called “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl” being a fantastic movie that has re-state the meaning of being the hero or living to full-fill our moral integrity by mixing entertaining and rather different characters with a story that is able to maintain suspense trough to the entire movie.

First of all, to prove why this movie is great we have to start talking about the main character, Jack Sparrow, the one that would prove to be the hero. He's the one that would swear to help the other main character named Will Turner to full-fill his goal of saving the girl he loves ("Well Mr. Turner, I’ve changed me mind. If you spring me from this cell, I swear on pain of death, I shall take you to the Black Pearl and your bonnie lass. Do we have an accord?")fact that makes them being involved in all types of situations, like being constantly persecuted, nevertheless, we found ourselves wanting him to accomplish his own goals, even though we know all he does is to help neither but himself, introducing a new version of anti-hero.

On the other hand, the movie would be able to maintain us entertained due to the line-story that focuses on an ancient curse made to a treasure containing pure Aztec-gold, turning to living-death every human that tries to spend it. Thus, making the watcher wanting to know how did they found it or how can they become alive again. The movie would also try to keep little details in secret in order to reveal them at a certain time in which they would prove to be of vitality to the story, a way in which they assure themselves the audience would be force to be paying attention.

Another thing that would revalidate the point of naming this movie fantastic would involve talking about the moral integrity issue. In usual movies we tend to see this type of hero that is really aware of his moral code and is ready to act no matter the circumstances to help others or to do the right thing all the time, nevertheless, being this a movie about pirates we have to remember that they live by with no moral code whatsoever, with the only rule to follow a code containing pirates own "rules". So, in the movie not only would we see the common selfish pirates that would stay united only if that would help them to achieve their personal interests, but we would also find that we prefer them to “win” rather than to let the RoyalNavy (in charge of "applying" justice) overpower them.

In conclusion, Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl is an awesome movie not only because it can keep us at the edge all the time, but also because it contains and teach us about this new kind of pirates that despite their so called lack of ethical code they would make us re-state our perspective of morality, or in other words,like Sparrow would say: "Me? I’m dishonest, and a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It’s the honest ones you want to watch out for, because you can never predict when they’re going to do something incredibly… stupid."

miércoles, 12 de enero de 2011

Future

"What's the thing you like to do the most?" this is the question that used to be hunting me since I began to look on what to become in the future. Most of the time I discover that people choose what to become due to the answer to that question, and that the answer to that question always comes with an anecdote on how they discover what they love to do, that moment which got imprinted in their heads and will never be forgotten. Nevertheless, I have two problems with this, one: I currently don't have a clue on what I like to do the most other than it includes reading and two: I have no anecdote regarding reading that has marked my memories. You see, I don't remember the first book I read because I was too young at the time (4 years...I thing) and I wouldn't dare to talk about the most important or fascinating one (they are just A LOT) so the only thing I could say is that I have always carried a book wherever I go but that doesn't seem to be that life changing.

So, I decided that while I keep looking for the perfect anecdote I could always told you why do I decided to keep looking, at least. When deciding what I wanted to become in the future the only thing I certainly knew was that I wanted it to involve reading, when my parents found out they seemed to accept it, nevertheless they also seemed a little bit worried, whenever they asked me what was I planning on study I'll answer "I really don't know" and so time passed. I choose to study communication because it seemed to be related to books but when I started taking classes I notice that I liked them (some of them a lot), but I wasn't really "fascinated". Worry became common in my life, should I try another career and see if that worked? Should I get a free year to think about my decision? Or should I stayed and see where that leads me? I wasn't sure on what to do, so I started going to see this psychologist at school that claimed they can tell you what you are good at with a simple test, in which they asked you if you prefer grapes or lemons and things like that, I took it and when result came out I knew it: All tests are garbage, you want to know what the test results said? That I should become a doctor, (yeah, right) so I went on with my life and hoped for the best.

One day, my father came up to me on a Saturday morning and told me to get in the car, that we were going somewhere, he drove while I listen and found out we were going to see one of his friends, another physiologist, nevertheless, he told me not to worry, that this wasn't some other crappy test like the others so I decided to give it a try. When we arrived, I thought they would send me to a room and asked me to fill eternal stupid really boring question again, but instead of that they (my father friend had come with her daughter, also my father's friend) told me the plan was to go have breakfast while chatting a little bit, so we went and I told them what I was currently studying, but besides that they seemed to have another type of weird questions, they started asking me what I liked to watch on TV, if I had seen this or that show, what movies had I seen recently, what I thought about them, funny anecdotes about my life, and books, what type did I like and what they were about. When we finish, I had totally forgotten the main reason we were there, so I was surprised when they told us to meet tomorrow again for a very brief explanation, somewhat I didn't expect them to tell me things again like "oh you are good at this you should totally do that" and I wasn't disappointed, the next day all they did was give me a little carpet which contain my current subjects, some of them circle with pencil making them stand out, asking me if those marked where the ones I had most interest in, they were, it was a little creepy I should say but they were, they told me they had just analyze the way I am but I should learn to do it myself, that knowing who we are and like it's not an issue we can solve in a moment but rather in a life, that I was doing it well so far but should always keep looking for the perfect job in which I would love everything I do. When I went to my house I started flipping through all the remain papers and found out something funny, all the pages gather things I had already know about myself, meaning they hadn't tell me something I really didn't know already but, maybe that was always the main point, to only help you realize all that's being there all the time, so you can continue acting on your own, with that thought in my mind I started searching for schools that could offer doing a second career in letters, because I had already promised myself to keep looking for what I love to do, and looking in both places at the same time seemed to be a difficult but worth it place to start, cause as I said I still don't know what will I become in the future, but now I know I have to keep searching until I found out.

martes, 11 de enero de 2011

"A legendary hero with a legendary story; live fast and die young"

This is the way in which we are introduced to James Dean in his official page, but even if we haven't heard of his name before just by that phrase: "live fast and die young" we can identify him with this well-known rebel attitude and famous life-style. To do a briefly summary of his life we can start by saying he is an American film actor that has become a cultural icon due to the complexity of the roles he got involved with, portraying this (now iconic) rebel guy that nevertheless seems to be widely misunderstood by everyone and seems to be fighting with a lot of emotional issues (some regarding parenthood).

He is also known for becoming a big star in little time (3 films only) due to the personification of "the restless American" in his films, the most popular being Rebel Without a Cause (1955) in which he portrayed Jim Stark (the troubled teenager), nevertheless, the think that impacted the most was his dead, being killed in a highway while going to compete on a race in Salinas.

In conclusion, James Dean remains an iconic idol due to the life-style he was able to portrait in his movies and life, opening the gate in which we found all the fears and hopes of teenagers being totally exposed.

Famous Quotes:

"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."

"The gratification comes in the doing, not in the results."
"If a man can bridge the gap between life and death, . if he can live on after he's dead, then maybe he was a great man."
"Only the gentle are ever really strong."






Reference:
CMG Worldwide, Inc., . (n.d.). James dean official website. Retrieved from http://www.jamesdean.com/about/quotesby.html